Thai massage turku kesäteatterit uusimaaScott (January 26, 2007). Retrieved January 28, 2007. 228 The software incorporates programming features such as a macro language, variables, a transclusion system for templates, and URL redirection.
Peniksen kehittäminen etsin miestä
Archived from the original on April 25, 2010. For Wikipedia's home page, see. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. And the world got a bit truthier". Archived from the original on August 3, 2014. 154 However, a peer review in 2005 of forty-two scientific entries on both Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica by the science journal Nature found few differences in accuracy, and concluded that "the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three." 17 Reagle. As of February 2014 it has 15,000,000 items and 1,000 properties for describing them. This position has been successfully defended in court. Already, the presidential entries are being edited, dissected and debated countless times each day." 314 An October 2007 Reuters article, titled "Wikipedia page the latest status symbol reported the recent phenomenon of how having a Wikipedia article vindicates one's notability.
Yle puhe netissä mansensexshop
In July 2002 (Phase III Wikipedia shifted to the third-generation software, MediaWiki, originally written by Lee Daniel Crocker. 282 Access to Wikipedia from mobile phones was possible as early as 2004, through the Wireless Application Protocol (WAP via the Wapedia service. The list concerns basic content by subject: biography, history, geography, society, culture, science, technology, and mathematics. 256 Internal news publications Community-produced news publications include the English Wikipedia's The Signpost, founded in 2005 by Michael Snow, an attorney, Wikipedia administrator and former chair of the Wikimedia Foundation board of trustees. Frewin, Jonathan (June 15, 2010). 100 101 Fewer editors become administrators than in years past, in part because the process of vetting potential Wikipedia administrators has become more rigorous.